InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DeerBalls

09/05/21 10:58 PM

#104696 RE: nyt #104695

I-WILL-REPEAT,-"guilty"-does-NOT-come-out-of-civil-court-and-neither-Emil-nor-VPLM-have-been-to-criminal-court!!!

I-WILL-REPEAT,-"guilty"-does-NOT-come-out-of-civil-court-and-Emil-nor-VPLM-have-been-to-criminal-court!!!


As to "patent troll": That IS just name-calling, but "patent trolls" buy their patents; VPLM WAS GRANTED AND ISSUED EVERY PATENT THEY HOLD!!!

Oh, none of the patents have been invalidated...NOT ONE!!



guilty of "breach of fiduciary duty" & "unjust enrichment"

icon url

DeerBalls

09/05/21 11:16 PM

#104698 RE: nyt #104695

BIG-DIFFERENCE-compared-to Virnetx:

With Virnetx, aapl is on its own and they can stupidly fight to the end...it has already cost them a judgement(PAID) of about $450mm + costs. I believe Virnetx will prevail in this appeal...another $555mm + costs... LOVE IT!!

With VPLM and the defendants in Waco, it isn't just appl... If things are going VPLM's way, one of the smaller players might just cave, with would hurt an ongoing appeal!!! It would be nice to see them fold like a house of cards...

WACO-A-GOGO... PATIENCE IS A VIRTUE...



In any event, with appeals, etc, I expect this to go on about the same as virnetx, ie, another 10 yrs.