Peter Freilinger's traits aren't very good. If you can manage to stay awake through his article, he's:
1.) Incredibly long winded and not focused...
2.) Trying to rewrite history to show what a great job he and others did at WAMU..
3.) Said repeatedly, WAMU "failed well" and "failed correctly."
4.) Said he is good with failure and people who aren't good with it are wrong....
5.) Said a couple of months before failure, he and others were already working for quick transition to new ownership... Geeeez, sounds like the Afghans...
6.) Never said he was sorry for all the shareholders and employees who were hurt...
After reading his article and his "failure is good" philosophy, now I know why WAMU failed...........