InvestorsHub Logo

AZCowboy

08/30/21 8:24 PM

#667859 RE: 955 #667851

~ Yes You Are Correct, Beginning with the WMI’ “First Day Filings”, I Closely Followed The 2’ Attempts To Get a version of “6” Pushed Through … I Wasn’t Completely Sure of the company’s investment future, Until Judge Walrath’s “September Opinion”, Released in September of 2011’ Of Course, Became Posted on the WMI Docket ~

That Singular President Setting Ruling, Set The Future of the Reorganized WMI’ as well as WMI’s Releasing Equity Classes … thus, the purpose for my stating for many years … ~ Understand Plan 6, “Participate” In Plan 7 ~ …

”We are at the mercy of the BOD's and it appears THJMW wanted it that way when she chose not to close out escrow shares per BR request”.



Rosies attempts were questioned by the Indentured Trustee / Property Trustee (Wells Fargo), … and the Trustee stated that the trustee would abide by whatever Judge Walrath ordered the Trustee to do … But ?, the Trustee wanted Judge Walrath to order the decision … Judge Walrath agreed with the Trustee, and Rosies attempts were denied …

So, … Judge Walrath ruled the creditor and claimant payments with the WMI Cash & Tax Refunds, giving the reorganized company, WMI to WMIHC, now to WMIH as COOP, to those that CHOSE to release individual WMI ownership, per Her instructions, and subsequently then CHOSE to invest in the Reorganized Company as well … always keeping the “Debentures” and the outer “WMI Subsidiary Network” Separate …

That is what happened., and that is where we are today … all outer considerations, rabbit holes etc., have been irrelevant …

AZ