Replies to post #398836 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[hope4patients]

Total and utter nonsense. The plaintiff would not have a cause of action. Any such lawsuit would be thrown out at the motion to dismiss stage (very early) and if I was representing NWBO I would file a motion for fees and costs (motion for sanctions) b/c any 1st yr law student should know that such a claim is not supported by existing law.

[flipper44]

You are confusing and confounding result publication with market approval and manufacturing readiness. Just because you don’t know results, does not mean the process of finally getting this to patients (commercially) is delayed due to your current transitory state of result ignorance.

[CherryTree1]

What you are failing to recognize is they have publicized the data back in 2018 . . . at least the data the could publicize before unblinding.
https://nwbio.com/updated-interim-data-from-phase-3-trial-of-dcvax-l-for-glioblastoma/
https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-018-1507-6
any GBM patient doing their DD looking for promising new/experimental treatments would have come across this and realized their tumor tissue should be preserved.
This is your erroneous allegation Curve.

I'd sue them for holding back vital information to my survival. I'd claim failure to inform to preserve my tumor, and failure to inform the medical community of efficacy on a timely basis.

You wouldn't be the first that have tried to sue them but so far all suits have been a dead end for the plaintiffs

[MI Dendream]

Not surprisingly LC2020, this is a nonsensical reply.

If what you say is true and I had GBM, I'd sue them for holding back vital information to my survival. I'd claim failure to inform to preserve my tumor, and failure to inform the medical community of efficacy on a timely basis.

You are saying that someone would have grounds to sue for harm done related to an investigational product that they have not taken and not only is it not marketed in the US, but not marketed anywhere in the world. One that not only does not have an anticipated release date, but to the best of the public’s knowledge has not even submitted a licensing application anywhere in the world. A product that you claim has no efficacy data or expectation for approval in the near to mid-term at all. A product that some here suggest has already failed its trial, information which is being withheld in order to swindle investors into not only holding stock in a failed enterprise but also exercising warrants with new investment dollars in that enterprise.

If you sincerely believe that you would have a valid reason to sue NWBO for this, then you are admitting that all of the theories that cast doubt on DCVaX-L have no basis in truth.

That is basically what you just said.