You mean to tell me for five years the failing Li, the failing ceo of LQMT of five years, the failing Li cob of LQMT for five years and the same failing Li who also held the title of president, but no longer does except for the failing cob title and who is also the same failing dominant shareholder who is still responsible for the failures at LQMT LF, and for the losses of over 75% of LQMT ‘s share price and market cap. The losses of over 75% of shareholder’s value. The same failing cob Li, who has failed to increase shareholder value and is responsible for the lack of progress PR’s, and a current share price of .10 cents.
And your only point is what? He is still the c.o.b.? Good luck with that.
A failing Li, whether he holds the titles of ceo, president, cob or broom sweeper at LQMT and is responsible for LQMT ‘s decline after pouring in $64 million in cash and holds a 45% controlling interest in LQMT and inks no contracts to improve shareholder value is a failing executive, no matter what title he holds.
Personally I would prefer a successful C.O. B. A successful Li
Making your points about Li and his controls does not a contract make. Look at the share price, look at the five year price chart. 10 cents. That is all the chairman of the board of LQMT is worth to his shareholders today.
TEN CENTS A SHARE AFTER FIVE YEARS IS THE C.O.B.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
