The current prez, who was the former owner/CEO, is the one who frudulently told investors he had successfully changed the name of the company - it was already done.
Then he fraudulently promised investors his company was investing a million dollars in one of the companies who later sued him for fraud.
Then he told investors he had sold the company and was not associated with it. But now he's president?
The SEC should have looked into those deceptive tweets.
The question investors should be asking now is, if Josh is making the decisions, why has he hired a confirmed liar and recent fraud defendant to represent the company? It reeks of cronyism.
Shareholders should demand to see the lawsuit settlement agreement to see if the company president paid a hefty settlement to dismiss the lawsuit. And if there was a stipulation that AIC be shut down to prevent future fraud.
Just as important is what, if any, settlement Steve-o made with Harrington for misrepresenting their working relationship and using Harrington's name to influence clients.
All of the above is unscrupulous behavior unbecoming of a company executive...except in pinkyland, where underhanded behavior is not only tolerated, it's expected and encouraged.
Come to think of it, maybe a crooked ex-car salesman who weaseled his way out of a lawsuit is the perfect choice to head a stinky-pinky.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
