InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

facts_matter14

08/13/21 5:39 PM

#81289 RE: ka ching #81287

Are you saying that anyone with under 100M is not a long, simply because they don’t have 100M shares?
Asking for those who have between 1M and 99.9M.

And are you saying that someone who has owned any shares, for at least 30 days, and has NEVER sold a single share, is not a long?
Asking for all the true longs who own less then 100M and have never sold a single share.

Are you saying anyone here for less then 4 years is not a long, simply because they didn’t own PHIL in 2017?
Asking for all of those who bought PHIL in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021?


icon url

facts_matter14

08/13/21 5:49 PM

#81292 RE: ka ching #81287

I wonder how true longs with under 100M shares feel about that question.....

Sorry to those of you with 1M, 5M, 10M, 25M, 50M, 60M, 75M, and 99M shares, as apparently, even if you haven’t sold a single share, like me, you are not a true long.

Bummer.
icon url

facts_matter14

08/13/21 6:02 PM

#81293 RE: ka ching #81287

Answering for all of the TRUE LONGS, who own less then 100M shares: Yes. Doesn't matter if you own 1M or 99M shares, if you are a true long, who practices what you preach about holding and not selling, then a true long is a true long, is a true long, regardless of how many shares they own.

No shame in owning any amount of PHIL for the long run.