InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FeMike

08/10/21 8:56 AM

#394639 RE: exwannabe #394636

And if they don't change the endpoints, the trial fails because of pseudo progression. They should just do that, right? Throw that baby out.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

08/10/21 9:15 AM

#394643 RE: exwannabe #394636

So you say,

The FDA would not fall for that game, but a subset of investors will


But this December 2019 FDA guidance says differently.
https://www.fda.gov/media/133660/download
icon url

thermo

08/10/21 9:17 AM

#394644 RE: exwannabe #394636

The answers to questions of (a) the use of external controls and (b) changing of endpoints (e.g. whether data snooping occurred or not) are not black and white. But the nuances are hard to discuss on a message board (actually, everything is hard to discuss on a message board).

I’ve considered these questions and yet hold a sizable position.
icon url

Dr Bala

08/10/21 9:27 AM

#394647 RE: exwannabe #394636

Hard to argue against the survival benefit. The last sentence is basically nonsense.
icon url

flipper44

08/10/21 10:53 AM

#394678 RE: exwannabe #394636

I see Sentiment Stocks showed you the 2019 guidelines (See pages 14 and 15) . The trial risk is legally mitigated. Give up ex. Moreover, an endpoint in the trial still evaluates treatment arm against placebo for survival efficacy. Give up.