InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dr Bala

08/01/21 12:24 PM

#392771 RE: exwannabe #392770

From LL's paper in 2018, the 2015 efficacy IA never took place. End of story.
icon url

anders2211

08/01/21 12:55 PM

#392779 RE: exwannabe #392770

I really would have liked to jump in here and rebuttal your left and right as what one of my favorite ways of passing the time is here, unfortunately, I know too little about the IA's for I was not invested in NWBO back then. Flipper and Bio have done a pretty good job.

In all your assertions attacking NWBO, your basic argument is NWBO is lying. By saying that you are at the same time asserting, as you just said today, material events have no meaning. That's your basic attitude they are lying about material events which have no legal meaning. So if that were true all invested in listed companies have absolutely no standing, no legal protection. What a crap argument.

What anyone here fails to understand is what your freaking point is.
You just throw around parts of sentences with nonsense fantasy with thought up conclusions from a far past.




icon url

biosectinvestor

08/01/21 4:14 PM

#392817 RE: exwannabe #392770

You switched and I do not know that to be true. The case was finished in 2017, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that easily could have added dates.

On the last round you claimed the decision only covered 2013 statements, even though the decision is from 2017 and references statements made in 2014 regarding the IA, addresses claims that incorporate any statements or events that might have happened in the intervening time that would bolster the claim, if plaintiff’s counsel did their amendment correctly, and the decision makes no qualified timing point, it is a categorical statement by the judge in 2017.