I agree it's in the best interest of the libtarded agenda to lower da cap rule. They'd lower it to zero if it would get more votes short term regardless of the consequences. IMO, the old Cap rule was sufficient and the system was never broken. It was meddled with by Gooberment threats to revoke the Charters if they didn't make many more risky loans to keep pumping an already overheated economy under da Bush Administration setting FnF up for siezure so there's no Angels in the historical narrative to be found. IMO, the biggest problem is the implied guarantee that Marrys da Gooberment to the private housing finance sector. Cut da apron strings already! The private sector will figure it out on its own without the help of Gooberment Angels and Devils.
get the PPS up to SAY 15-20 by cutting capital ratio by 50% - saying the LP/LT Senior paper paid back by 100B extra !!! and then NO NEED for SPO as capital raise is 50% and we are already on the way
all that done
GOV - TREASURY exercises warrants - gets shares - sells 4B shares for 15-20 or whatever and then uses that money to help expand supply and access
so simple ---- so simple and as our shares - our 20% at that point are identical in ownership - we are at 15 20 25