explanation ~ we don't per se need "permission" ..however, we need a director that was ethical, in integrity, lawful, TRANSPARENT, etc by chance, did the entrusted director legally breach their fiduciary responsibility ? additionally it's not that we're not going to receive something (pennies per share) the issue is "will the funds be what they should have been if admin was acting in good faith on behalf of common shareholders ?" because if any of these allegations turn out to be true, than our pps will be effectively substantially less e.g. restructuring company without alerting common shareholders, waterfall payment, 400 million preferred shares, etc.. .