InvestorsHub Logo

goodietime

07/08/21 5:37 PM

#94169 RE: sidedraft #94168

Wouldn't the Company need to make an Official Statement about that?

IronMan123

07/08/21 6:06 PM

#94172 RE: sidedraft #94168

It is a catch 22 situation. If the class situation is certified and paid they may be the only ones to receive money and the rest of the CT holders could just be OUT OF LUCK. BUT your view holds true as well. WHAT TO DO, WHAT TO DO? Sign don't sign.

AKAPAK

07/08/21 7:05 PM

#94173 RE: sidedraft #94168

There is always an "opt out" clause before accepting payment.

And besides, is the class action suit going against Lehman not paying us or the Trustee not performing their duties?

IMO, not legal, but think this will not be part of the BK court.

What have you got to lose by going after the crooks. one way or another?

Docsavag

07/08/21 9:34 PM

#94178 RE: sidedraft #94168

While the issues here are related, they are not one in the same. The suite, I believe, is going after BNYM for not performing their fiduciary duties. It is separate, in my opinion, in stating that Lehman BK has an obligation to pay the CTs based upon the prospectus. Not a lawyer, but this stands to reason that they are different situations.