Replies to post #17779 on VNUE Inc (VNUE)

[StockWatch45]

Particularly great to see this after having to read months fear mongering and handwringing calling into question the management just because things didn't materialize overnight (6mos-1yr is overnight in business). Gotta love it seeing all of that intentional FUD being proven nonsense.

[tedpeele]

wow, I'm glad he is fired up because maybe that means he knows some positive answers things that we don't know about regarding the following:

1. what it will take to fully complete Soundstr

2. placing Soundstr in many locations that want it

3. the probability that the bill will pass this time around

4. the actual fixed price that is being set

5. how much money is coming initially and when

6. how friendly gs really will be -- ie how to avoid the effect that dilution might have on the stock price


I take offense to his calling people morons if he is including people like me that have legitimate questions about things like we see above. It's one thing to think positively, and it is another to assess one's investment by thinking analytically and critically.

ALL of those issues above will affect this stock price and will affect it dramatically. This history of the stock price here proves that it isn't all about execution although that is important. The logistics that affect the demand and supply of stock are extremely important. The people/habits of all of the marketplace buyers and sellers matter a great deal.

I hope he can do something about toxic lenders but I've never seen any CEO have an effect on something like that before. It's just the way it is. Hopefully not here.

[tedpeele]

This part of his FB posting is curious:

And for those engaged in the practice of toxic lending - meaning outfits that are just in the business to effectuate egregious profits off the backs of small cap public companies - the SEC is coming for you and I'm thrilled, and you will not take advantage of VNUE. And I will be glad to throw the SEC an assist if they should ask.

If the possibility of toxicity in the funding from gs isn't even there, why did he even mention this at all?