InvestorsHub Logo

Lite

07/01/21 6:04 AM

#687380 RE: kthomp19 #687324

This was posted some time ago when hopes were placed on Judge Sweeney’s Court. I thought it to be a rather good post - my apology, I cannot recall the author.

“Who owned the property at the time of the taking should NOT be of any concern to the Judge. Her priority should be focused on whether or not a taking occurred of private property period....NOT who owned it and when.

The 5th Amendment does NOT specify who the owners are or when they owned it. It simply states, "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." F&F were taken for public use and F&F now must be justly compensated.

The fact is the Gov stole F&F under FALSE pretenses, used the STOLEN funds for it's own benefit at increased taxpayer risk and expense and continues to pillage the goose that lays golden eggs. F&F must now be compensated for it irregardless of who the present owners are. If the present owners benefit, then so be it, it should NOT be of any concern of Gov who profits off their mistake.

Investors should be free to "shop for a lawsuit" if they so desire, without fear of punishment for doing so. Gov put itself in that position when they decided to commit the robbery in the first instance.

Owners should NOT be held liable for Gov wrong doing. There is a price to be paid when criminals commit crimes and it is the job of the courts to see that prosecution of these criminals is carried out to the fullest extent of the law. It's time for Judge Sweeney to stop protecting the real criminals here and side with justice being served. “

I believe it is now up to Judge Lambert and Wheeler to carry the torch. The question is, will the torch be used to illuminate Justice, or burn the Constitution that We, as Investor and tax-payers, hoped would protect our rights?

I have faith that there are some that understand what truly happened - the third admendment wasn’t part of the original C-ship contract. Had it been, I would not have been an investor and would have made my fortune with Facebook. Wreck less abandonment by those tasked with restoring the Enterprises and releasing them was and still is the root cause of this issue .

I wish all well and hope the Biden Administration can see that by releasing the Enterprises back to the Shareholders, they will re-coup capital gains and inject monies back into the economy as Investors are allowed to spread their profits thru other investments . This, I believe, is what investing, free enterprise and capitalism is all about.

Mnemonic

07/01/21 4:34 PM

#687486 RE: kthomp19 #687324

Thank you for your insights and clear reasoning.

Another unrelated question:

Why is it generally accepted in the courts that the NWS did not constitute a purchase of new securities?

Seems to me that the NWS doesn't have much, if anything in common with the original contract. It pays a dividend, sure, but that dividend isn't even based on Treasury's share count. Couldn't this be construed as the purchase of new securities which would be barred by HERA since it took place after 2009?