Although I am running out of optimism for the remand, IF it goes to trial and the court expands the scope of discovery to include all intra governmental communications regarding the nws implementation in any situations involving a confirmed director (because POTUS WAS POWERLESS TO EXECUTE HERA AS HE SAW FIT AND IN THEORY AT LEAST THE POTUS COULD HAVE WANTED TO GO ONE WAY BUT THE CONFIRMED DIRECTOR DISAGREED) then the Collins Plaintiffs may discover more documentation that could result in evidence that a Judge could use to justify some monetary relief!
I think alot might depend on:
(1) Whether Collins can survive the gubmints upcoming Motions to Dismiss
(2) The gubmints Motion to deny expanded Discovery.
(3) Will Judge Willett or Haynes be assigned to the trial? Will we get a Judge who understands exactly what happened here?
(4) Will JB appoint a lefty Judge to the 5th Circuit who rules in favor of da gubmint on an Appeal or EnBanc Panel ruling and happens to be the deciding vote?
But at a minimum some juicy intra governmental communications may be revealed and if a Judge who understands exactly what happened here is the trial Judge, then they will probably be more likely than not to at least provide some relief.
But it seems like the Unconstitutional Takings Case in COFC? may be the best bet in eventually getting some type of relief from this abusive and coercive 12.75 year+ governmental theft of the shareholders private personal property.