Replies to post #11157 on PowerLinx Inc (PWNX)

[TAfirehawk]

Rich's position is very defendable. You have helped twist the facts to your benefit and most people here do not even have 1/2 the story on this. Just like A@P, a little bit of truth taken here or there and editorial commentary can be combined to create any perception.

SeaView is not helping your cause or Rich's either by being silent. BUT SEAVIEW IS HELPING THE COMPANY SUCEED THE BEST WAY THEY CAN BY NOT STOOPING TO THIS LEVEL AND FOCUSING ON THE BUSINESS

I hope they keep this tight lip except to the SEC and a court of law of course.

JMHO, Adam Jordan

[gotinearly]

FG...

I do not consider myself backing mcbride, that is the problem. I am simply decerning what the actual meaning of all this is. There are several possibilities, as I stated here

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=164514

Also, any info you could come up with on the privatization(sp?) requirements would certainly be appreciated. For example, how much (%) ownership is needed in order to initiate such an action and if the privateers have to buy all non-comers. There must be some SEC regs on this topic.

TIA