InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

06/19/21 10:56 AM

#660261 RE: mordicai #660255

Mordi

But it is good enough for him so, IT's correct right, you know it's a, KNOW WHAT YA OWN thing

Split T

06/19/21 10:51 PM

#660314 RE: mordicai #660255

Mordicai, It's plain to see in the Letter Rosen wrote to Andrew Vara, where he stated that "unfortunately" the Underwriters get the same treatment as other Class 19 participants. Class 19 Participants were given Escrows Markers...whether or not the Underwriters where given Escrow shares is a moot point if they are in the same Class. Rosen didn't lie, but he sure as hell set out to deceive the Court and Class 19 Participants about what the Underwriters were actually entitled to
through the Stipulation.

His letter to Vara is very clear as to what the Underwriters will get if there is a Major payout. Alice is right and several other here are misinterpreting the facts or can't clearly comprehend what Rosen said in the letter to Vara. I pointed this out in my letter to Vara which was docketed.

All the facts are in the letter, but you must do your own homework and read all documents and rules that are referred to in Rosen's letter to Vara.

Disclaimer, I have substantial shares of all flavors and the 1% may cost me an arm and a leg, but I'm damn sure smart enough to make up that potential 1% loss in less than two weeks. I want what is due me now and they are messing with fire if we are not paid what we have coming by August 15th at the latest.

"Speaking of sloppy... you have linked an order by which merely gave the LT permission to file a reply. It is absurd to believe that by such an order Walrath has adopted the assertions made by the LT in that Reply."