Replies to post #660187 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[mypenneys]

So have the underwriters been paid already in COOP Shares

[BBANBOB]

""" UW did not get ESCROW cusips"""

WOW I must have missed that part!!!!!!!

And that goes 100% against what HOSEN actually wrote in a letter as well !!!!!!!!!

Not gonna say YOU ARE WRONG, but sure would like to hear or see that part again

[AZCowboy]

~ BoardDork, You Are Correct, Actual Knowledge of the Documented Process ?, Should Be Obtained FIRST ?, Prior To These Continued (meaningless) Debate's, ~

Direct From The Submission Filing, Ultimately Approved By The Judge:

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229210610000000000001

9. Put simply, under the Plan and the Bankruptcy Code, it does not matter whether the underwriters received escrow markers (they did not) or, even if they hypothetically did receive one, which escrow marker it would be; every dollar of allowed claim in the class shares the same pro rata recovery based on the total amount of allowed claims in the class, regardless of escrow marker.

and:

* 4 In the Amended Complaint, Griffin refers to these escrow markers as “CUSIPs” and asserts that each such escrow marker is entitled to different treatment within Class 19. As explained further in this section, Griffin miscomprehends the class structure of the Plan and her belief is incorrect.

* 6 Griffin’s assertion that Reorganized WMI does not benefit from the release as it is not among the “Released Parties”
in the Plan is simply a misunderstanding of the operation of bankruptcy laws.

=======

I agree with these statements and other statements made, ... ("a-ellen-g"), went into litigation on "assumptions" ... that's why she lost' ... sloppy, sloppy, sloppy, and very poorly researched material ...

=======

and, Judge Walrath Agreed;

The Signed Court Order
http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229210610000000000005

AZ