InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The Danish Dude

06/16/21 1:30 PM

#384820 RE: flipper44 #384818

Precisely flipper44.

Totally corroborate that summaries were in place by statisticians before Kristyn Power got hired April 1st.

And why TLD could be predicted by March 16th. to be ready for publication … right about now … the funk soul brothers.
icon url

exwannabe

06/16/21 1:45 PM

#384827 RE: flipper44 #384818

How can you say it was not in quotes? It was within the

tags.

You quoted somebody or something when you posted

... May 18, 2021 Trial already internally unblinded and being analyzed




icon url

biosectinvestor

06/16/21 5:41 PM

#384857 RE: flipper44 #384818

Agreed. Thanks Flipper.
icon url

Kam8

06/16/21 6:06 PM

#384868 RE: flipper44 #384818

Thanks alot your great insightful analysis, seem we will see official unblinded in any minute.
icon url

meirluc

06/16/21 8:52 PM

#384895 RE: flipper44 #384818

I’d like to be able to go into the details that we know everybody is craving, and understandably so, but we are in a quiet period now, while the data are being reviewed and analyzed.” — LP May 18, 2021.



Assuming that by now (a months later), the review and analysis phases have been completed, can anyone estimate how much longer it will take for us to see TLD and a peer reviewed publication? Could it take an additional 4-6 months?

OTOH I am not excluding the possibility that LP was referring to an ongoing review and analysis of a publication that had already been submitted to a journal but for obvious reasons was unable to divulge that and instead referred to it as reviewed and analyzed data. I hope that this is the case because it is hard for me to believe that it took more than 7 months past data lock for the statisticians to complete their work whose complete analysis and review was still pending one month ago.