InvestorsHub Logo

BBANBOB

06/02/21 10:38 AM

#657924 RE: xoom #657922

XOOM

HMMMMMMMMMMM?????????????

Where does she state 10 billion?????

I could have sworn that she stated WELL IN EXCESS OF 10 bill


22.In late 2019 Plaintiff received information from another Legacy Holder in communication with an employee of a major securities broker (the “Source”). The Source stated that when Plaintiff’s federal appeals are finally adjudicated and the Trust dissolved,8 Mr. Cooper will distribute Mr. Cooper Stock to Legacy Holders. The Source stated that Defendant Mr. Cooper is in possession of well in excess of $10 billion dollars in mortgage-backed securities and/or mortgages formerly owned by WMI (the “MBS”) which assets are subject to interests of Plaintiff and other Legacy Holders.

novascotiaSTS

06/02/21 10:44 AM

#657926 RE: xoom #657922

She has changed her claim from 600bn to 10bn?

Is this in her new filing?

AZCowboy

06/02/21 11:36 AM

#657934 RE: xoom #657922

~ Hello XOOM', None of That' "bop" Stuff' Actually Matters', Never Has', ZERO', ~

It's The SDNY Court', That Is Not Going To Allow The Summons She "a-ellen-g" Requested To Be Served, ... Because "An Event" Has Not Actually Occurred' ... hearsay, attempting to predict the future ?', IS NOT A RECOGNIZED Legal Event Type ... bop's request is "DEFICIENT" ... its right there, direct from the SDNY Court', in plain language' ... period' ... "it is what it is"

========

NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Alice Ellen Griffin to RE-FILE Document No. 9 Request for Issuance of Amended Summons, 7 Request for Issuance of Amended Summons, 8 Request for Issuance of Amended Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the request for issuance of summons. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF.

========

this is simply a continuation of more of the sloppy and poorly researched', irrelevant monkey business' ... This may help, as I answered "2Kids" the other day ...

~ 2Kids, I've Been Consistent, "a-ellen-g" Has Not, nor Will Not Change A Thing, "NOTHING", Nothing Regarding WMIH ("COOP"), or Nothing Regarding WMI's, Now Implemented Reorganization', There Will Be "ZERO Impact" ~

... my descriptive terms used ever since 2019' have been, "sloppy and poorly researched material", remain my opinion through this most recent legal blunder' filed in SDNY', ... "a prediction of an event', based on hearsay" ... seriously ? ... That, is NOT how our Legal System Functions' ... (simplified, you can't have the kid next door arrested because another neighbor told you he was planning on stealing your car) ... Yes, within its many flaws', our legal system does not function that way and is what it is' ...

Judge Walrath's Bankruptcy "Signed Orders" and "Directives", leading to her "First Day Filings" Foundation', her denial of "6" and then her forcing of a mediated' "7", ... which always' included the separations of ANYTHING WaMu Held outside of the Holding Company's (the management) Bankruptcy', is very well documented, ... These actions lead to the "Disclosure Statement" (always a BK's dominant document, ours is no different) and the subsequent implementation of a Court Approved Plan' ... (again, our process was very long, involved and complex, BUT ? it followed legal protocol') ...

Regarding this continued ratio of distribution debate, ... the 75/25 ratio of distribution is LIMITED to any holders of an LTI (a Liquidation Trust Interest) that the "wmi-lt" issued ... past or present tense ... At This point in time, the "wmi-lt" has fulfilled the payments to ALL WMI's creditors, per the Court Order as of January of 2020' ... and as I stated years ago, ... the "wmi-lt" was NOT ever going to issue any LTI's to the ... "equity classes" ...

the "wmi-lt" remains viable merely to insure that the Disclosure Statement Directives, given to the "Trustee(s)", functioning outside of the Holding Company's BK's are in a legal position to COMPLETE their fiduciary duties' ... They ALL Will' ...

Washington Mutual Inc., IS NO MORE ... It filed for Chapter 11, went through our Legal Process, and has now reorganized, 1st into WMIHC, then into "WMIH" ... Our Current Parent Corporation' ...

the "wmi-lt" is also done, finished, financially deplete, and completed, and will only RE-APPEAR', ... IF ? ... the GSA, the "Disclosure Statement" and Judge Walrath's Plan are Violated' ... to date, those agreements', have not been violated' ...

Our DTC' Issued ESC Cusips remain intact', quite contrary' to the debtors representative blustering in open court about what he' was never actually able to do', ... Yes, those ESC Cusips', maintain a record of "Who Owned What" and "WHO Properly "Participated" ... humorously, even Alice understands this within her legal losses, and her most recent predictions' of hearsay' ...

I hope that was helpful, ...

Currently, ... "COOP" ... is the trading symbol being used by a segment of the entire Company' ... "WMIH" ... but again and also, ... "COOP" is NOT a depiction of the ENTIRE Company's Financial Relevance and Subsidiary Network ...

Good Luck To YOU' and the Kids'

AZ

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164058992

========

AZ