InvestorsHub Logo

jrs5

05/27/21 6:46 PM

#213690 RE: Boilingman #213689

The device must be sold in EU or US for revenue to go to LQMT. Don't worry, there will be positive news coming soon.

makingitnow

05/27/21 6:55 PM

#213693 RE: Boilingman #213689

word

makingitnow

05/27/21 7:02 PM

#213696 RE: Boilingman #213689

if you say Liquid metal (separate words) I am understanding you mean BMG, if you say Liquidmetal you mean LQMTs BMG

Researchfyi

05/27/21 8:46 PM

#213700 RE: Boilingman #213689

If that were true. You would not be looking at .08 and daily volumes less than a 1/16 of 1% of the float.

That is the obvious reason.

Another reason would be found in the 10Q's. Whereby lqmt and the other party to an agreement are bound to silence.

Then there is the missing 8K filling, indicating nothing has been inked yet of any substantial amount of revenues to impact the SP.

And finally the original underwriters and those MM's holding onto the .08 cent hot potato shares of lqmt. would have already upped the bid to a buck if just a whiff of it were close to being true. True meaning; if $$$ from potential future sales or any actual sales were ever thought possible to somehow trickle down into the coffers of lqmt.

Just look at the SP's of those companies in China associated with the product's manufacture comprised of LM/BMG. Do you see them jumping hoops? No you don't. In fact some are near their lows, like lqmt. In essence one, meaning anyone does not need to know who is manufacturing what, where or when, when the $$$ that is supposed to be trickling in, in China from these hinge sales is in fact not raising the value of those stocks.

Its a good post with a lot of unverifiable knowns.

But who knows? Far be it from me to know more than the wall street crowd. After all it is only my opinion and everyone knows my opinions are always worth less than the price of lqmt.

lqmt is close. They're just not there yet. The point is you have shares and those shares will be worth a lot more, whenever they can announce a sale. They just cannot announce, what they cannot announce. That would be pumping, misleading or violating a signed statement resulting in more than the loss of contracts worth. Not to mention it would be illegal.



Dlicious1

05/27/21 10:19 PM

#213704 RE: Boilingman #213689

NOW TELL ME—AND I'M SORRY TO BE CAPITILIZING HERE FOR EMPHASIS—BUT IF THIS IS TRUE (and the mention of liquidmetal is our LIQUIDMETAL and not some other company's)—WHY HASN'T LQMT OR LUGEE LI SIMPLY STATED THIS IN A PRESS RELEASE in the United States? THIS IS MARKETING 101. WHY WOULD YOU NOT SHOUT TO THE ROOFTOPS THAT MAJOR COMPANIES ARE USING THIS MATERIAL? THIS MAKES NO SENSE.

LQMT MARKETING DEPARTMENT...PLEASE WAKE UP.

-------------------------------------------------

Good point. Fair Question.

Anyone beside Yappy have any valid reasons? I can't think of any.