Replies to post #94628 on HUMBL Inc (HMBL)

[Jahvik]

That’s incredible!
We write whatever we want with no sources and don’t claim the information to be true but we can write whatever.

[samsamsamiam]

And? Was there something in the article that was a lie? Funny how some prefer to attack the messenger and ignore the message.

Was there something in that article that was a flat out lie?
Personally i think they are a little late if they just shorting it now and not when the symbol changed when George Sharp bought those first 109 shares at $4.20 with his limit price set at $5.00.

But hey maybe that’s what drew them into researching it. And they obviously did their research.


Well I will say this - if George had still been around he would have had a press release out in a heartbeat just like they did with Golden Panda which paled in comparison to this research article. Bet he’s pisssed as hell and right now he can’t rant publicly on Twitter while he keeps his account private. Might not want those defense lawyer on that custodian case to see his true colors.

[common_cents]

so? big deal.

Every analyst who hypes a stock they are following at absurd valuations does the same thing....but you're fine with that...right?

EVERYTHING in the research report was factual. Try actually arguing the points...and stay away from the false narrative that because they are short..that somehow that takes away from the facts.

See you at .40 on the way to .10

Fair value around .10/share..maybe.

CC

[Scotttrader80]

ROFLMAO doesnt much matter what their disclaimer is, these shitheads did their damage with their bullshit articles just like all the other companies they short,

[samsamsamiam]

And here are some of the results of their research in the past:
https://hindenburgresearch.com/about-us/