InvestorsHub Logo

marjac

05/20/21 5:25 PM

#340450 RE: Number sleven #340449

It would seem as much. Let's see if Amarin's lawyers go to town on that statement.

Meowza

05/20/21 5:58 PM

#340458 RE: Number sleven #340449

To my layman's eyes and ears, that sounds sorta like burden shifting. "Secondary" considerations "shouldn't" overcome obviousness, it "should" be the other way around. I.e., "prima facie" has to survive objective indicia. Which serves as a check. All in my lay opinion.