Replies to post #65290 on SPOOZ Inc (SPZI)

[jaykk]

I mentioned before I am an old time shareholder who got burned 13 years ago so I remain very skeptical until things unfold and more information is provided with proper forms submitted.

I'm nervous because if Paul is starting things up again I don't understand why the website is not active and says it is for sale when you go to it The second reason is the comment made about the 10,000 share trade made after 13 years prompting Paul to resurrect the company. The stock was listed at .0001 at the time so a 10,000 share trade comes to a total $ 1.00 plus commission. Things still seem odd though of course I will be ecstatic if we even reached a few pennies for a share price,

[Gbathat]

I concur that PR was strange. Someone went on a buying rampage on spzi and it was not due to anything with the previous management.

Perhaps Paul and Errol are just trying to get it current to ensure a clean transition, and perhaps legally they need to say they are starting back up in a manner consistent with the original charter.

I still see this as a reverse merger. Paul is a really smart guy and knows the game.

The statement in the PR that I really did not like was that they have in no way benefited from the buying activity.

Yet they stated that the buying activity was literally why they opened up their doors, i.e., it clearly had some benefit to them. My guess is what they intended to say was that they did not sell any shares or take any money (yet).

I'd like them to disclose how many shares they have.

Ride freebies on this one, don't bet the house.