InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

trocprofit

05/10/21 9:44 AM

#375779 RE: FeMike #375778

Yes, LP, LG and the lot could agree not hold all options and warrants for a period of time which would de-risk the over-allotment. It would allow time to make whatever deal they are exploring. IMO, going it alone would be a LP ego play and not a benefit to GBM patients. There is no scenario where I see the treatment getting to patients faster going it alone. Partnerships are a possibility, but again, a longer road and less value to shareholders, IMO. A buyout is the best for patients and shareholders, IMO. And the "comments" from DI stating they are working towards the best outcome for patients and shareholders points me in the buyout direction.
icon url

flipper44

05/10/21 9:49 AM

#375783 RE: FeMike #375778

Sometimes what large pharma companies seem to allow is for a small company to uplist and raise its price by a certain amount after (or concurrent with) TLD in order that the inevitable buyout offer becomes a more reasonable premium. It just seems to work out like that. Here, it seems NWBO and/or BP(s) willingly shackled NWBO’s price per share until such time that irrefutable proof is presented. Thus you have DI actually saying the price per share got ahead of itself when it rose to 2.50. Obviously, the shackles were still on then, and clearly appear to remain for now. IMHO that’s the only thing that makes sense when DI actually frowns on price per share increase early on in his stint at NWBO.
icon url

marzan

05/10/21 10:00 AM

#375791 RE: FeMike #375778

Merck is doing an investors' call on 6/7 ASCO evening. Could be interesting!