PD with the coupons V is cheaper than gV - so if its all about price the patient would be choosing V over gV but they are not provided with that choice and therein lies the infringement
I wonder how many scripts had the “Reduce it” indication on them and were still substituted? If HN offered gV in that situation would you agree on infringement?
There should be a PA process to get gV since it represents a much smaller market for use and hence its approval. If the use is for MACE reduction in a CV patient - gV is not covered.