InvestorsHub Logo

Lemmiwinks

05/04/21 6:43 PM

#338518 RE: sts66 #338515

Unless we truly cursed...they are nearly toast by their own admissions. We will see. I expect nothing and continue to accumulate cause I’m an idiot.

ralphey

05/04/21 9:32 PM

#338538 RE: sts66 #338515

Hilarious - I think we were all taught this in 3rd grade - just because Johnny robs a bank it doesnt make it right for you to now rob a bank... I cant seriously believe they are making that argument ?

Also it would be listed on a higher tier not lower ....


Amarin alleges Health Net induces infringement by listing Amarin’s brand drug
product on a lower tier and offering more favorable payment terms for the generic product despite knowing others purportedly use the generic product to infringe.

ralphey

05/04/21 9:37 PM

#338540 RE: sts66 #338515

Any evidence purportedly showing a pharmacist is induced by the pharmacy plan would contradict evidence other sources (e.g, the prescription, Hikma’s label, or Hikma’s press releases) encouraged the pharmacist’s infringement.



SO if I understand this argument correctly there is absolutely no purpose to a formulary . INsurers hire PBMS to design formularies and restrict patient access to medications just for the fun of it - they dont really mean anything