InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bill B

05/04/21 12:55 PM

#338448 RE: rafunrafun #338440

It hasn't yet been proven in court that Hikma infringed although that's the consensus here. That's what I meant by yet to be proven. The only opinion that matters is that of the court.

As for the SC case, any percentage above 1% they will even hear the case is rampant optimism. I concede that if they do take the case Amarin's chances go through the roof.

Perhaps I misunderstand the mood here when I see posters commenting about pending cases with the expectation that Amarin will receive a favorable opinion without regard as to whether the case will even be heard. My bad.
icon url

hayward

05/04/21 1:13 PM

#338451 RE: rafunrafun #338440

rafunrafun

I thought we sent them a letter regarding the fact that generic could not be substituted for V for CVD.

Michael