Replies to post #338429 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[mrmainstreet]

This is why I agree with ralphey about expanding the suit to include more defendants. Shine the light on everyone who is infringing throughout the pipeline from doctor to patient. Make all key players either defend their actions or turn on each other.

[Bill B]

Would they be any more responsible for infringement than say a tv manufacturer unknowingly selling tv's with chips in them that (yet to be proven) violate a competing chip manufacturer's patent?

As an aside, this board's history in predicting an outcome in any of the legal issues Amarin has been associated with has been so absolutely dismal it's a safe bet for anyone to take a contrarian view to the consensus of posters here. Just on that observation alone I will take the view that the SC will not hear Amarin's appeal, Amarin will lose this case with Hikma and the rule 60 appeal will be denied with no comment.

The sooner Amarin puts all these legal issues behind it the sooner mgmt can focus on the future, which is ROW.

[iryokabu]

Health Net barely mentioned about prior authorization which is the key fact of infringement.

[Meowza]

Why should I have to know about gun patents? I don't even have a CCP!

Why should I have to know about BMW's trademark? I don't even have a driver's permit!

Why should I have to worry about the legal BAC level? I'm not even 21!

Why should I have to get the facts right? I'm not even following precedent!

...and on and on

[lizzy241]

raf, sounds like an answer that a wiseass kid would say, not my yob mun ;-)