Replies to post #338342 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[eightisenough]

marj-the ct found prejudice period. You claim fraud but the court bifurcated the standing from rule 60.

In the COURT's eyes fraud was not proven "nor should be taken into account to eliminate prejudice". Hence the ct denied standing without deciding on fraud.

Unless very favorable panel is presented (which we know the chances to that) the appeal will be rejected.

They will defend Du in this matter.

Our best chance is infringement case which will give us the us market---no point to fight a battle you cannot win against du. Just will cause you anguish and precious time.

9

[Invest83838]

Marjac, Again Thank You for Your Efforts

Can the Appellate Court Rule 36 your appeal?

I was so very disgusted when they, in essence, laughed off Singer

and supported Judge Du the 1st go-around

and then didn't provide any explanation based on Rule 36

Since I don't expect the USA Court System to do the right thing,

I fully expect the Appellate Court to rule against you

and then don't provide you any explanation based on Rule 36,

no matter the validity of your argument

[hypo]

Marjac, I love it!!!

[shadolane]

Will the appeals court hear the appeal or can they Rule 36 again?