Comforting to hear. I wonder what your position is on the following:
Apparently the original waterfall chart was in place at the time of the purchase agreement. With that being said, being that this is a public company and the patents were a substantial portion of the value of the public company as a whole, is it not illegal to withhold the waterfall chart from the public who are buying shares of a company (essentially stake in patents held by the company)? Or is there a way for Billy Carter and team to argue that UOIP had value outside of the patents that can be deemed much more valuable then the patents at the time (which we would all here refute as we bought shares in the patents, not the lifeless shell of a company with no future potential in sight).
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
