InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dragon man

01/19/07 11:49 AM

#2430 RE: tradedilly #2429

but we own that. if we get boss hog out of the office and rest of the hoods, then we got good comppany. why kill that and lose money when we go after red chip and get all our lose plus attorney fees, we put them out business and we still own our company. we get boss hog out, all the hoods, one of the hood is RM. not sure of his true connection but, the more you read the complain file by boss hog ex company, the dirty on him. he no fool and he because of his relation ship with boss hog, he just like the rest of the hoods.
icon url

marsnvest

01/19/07 11:58 AM

#2431 RE: tradedilly #2429

i think there has been false and misleading statements. I also know there are assets. I would not want the SEC to fix the problem and kill the company. Just as I believe filing a lawsuit will only make the lawyers richer. If the SEC would remove the "questionables" from the board while the investigation is going on, now I would love that. If the SEC is working for the shareholders, this would be ideal. I am just not assured that this is the route that would be taken. I do not believe the SEC can force them to step down. If anyone has more info on this that is constructive, please enlighten us all.