You both have very valid points and this is why I see many roads to recovery of shareholder’s representation. It seems to me that this is very clear due to the timeline on the UO!P agreement and then the large loans that were clearly for personal gain as the need for capital to pursue legal action was probably pennies on the dollar for what was loaned.
Bentham might find themselves suing the con artists here in the future as they might not get the funds they thought they had in a bag when giving away their bags of money,
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
