Replies to post #332779 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Meowza]

Explain? Your post is conclusory and directly ignores several passages from marjac's Rule 24 motion.

[north40000]

Eh? Best reread the case law cited in post #s 332708-9, 332776 and then Rule 24 + marjac’s original filed memo/brief re same.

Do you continue to view standing as a problem? Kindly explain the problem that I fail to see.

[marjac]

The Ninth Circuit, as well as the Restatement (2nd) of Judgments disagree, as corporations and their shareholders are deemed to be in privity as a matter of law. Headwaters Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service, 399 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2005).