Replies to post #218551 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[arachnodude]

No, it's our lucky day to garner responses from you. Thank you for that.

I'll just address the response to me...

My fingertips have access like anyone else's. I'm not special in that regard. I will say I've had a lot of practice finding the information the company has released, though. I'm quick to pick up on how and where to find it.

1) Wondering does lead to some healthy opinions, I must say. I just go by what the company says. Easier and less stressful that way. For me, at least.

2) You lost me at "Silkmaster says." I just go by what the company says. I suggest it to anyone looking for the "keys to the kingdom" as it applies to KBLB.

3) "Shady" sounds like an opinion. Here again, I can only go by what a company representative has divulged.

4) And don't forget the reasons for doing so which were rewarded almost immediately...Nearly-Pure Spider Silk. One could argue the "Immunity Worms," too, but, I'm not sure if that directly applies to the Army contract. Although the funding did aid in the lab development, so, yeah, let's add that, too.

5) "Seems like" sounds like another opinion. All I did is report what the company said. They've been stating the MOU since 2019. Then in 2021 they broke "radio silence" to mention Polartec again in their "First-ever Spider Silk shipment" PR dated February 23, 2021.

6) Must have got tired.

7) See #6

8) "Was that ever discussed here?" Now I understand why all the questions. One has to read what the company says. Not what is discussed here to get the REAL info.

9) Lost in the shuffle, I guess.

Thanks for reading, too. But I really would suggest reading what the company says. They really do know more than all of us combined about what's really going on with their company.

[arachnodude]

I'll just address the response to me...

My fingertips have access like anyone else's. I'm not special in that regard. I will say I've had a lot of practice finding the information the company has released, though. I'm quick to pick up on how and where to find it.

1) Wondering does lead to some healthy opinions, I must say. I just go by what the company says. Easier and less stressful that way. For me, at least.

2) You lost me at "Silkmaster says." I just go by what the company says. I suggest it to anyone looking for the "keys to the kingdom" as it applies to KBLB.

3) "Shady" sounds like an opinion. Here again, I can only go by what a company representative has divulged.

4) And don't forget the reasons for doing so which were rewarded almost immediately...Nearly-Pure Spider Silk. One could argue the "Immunity Worms," too, but, I'm not sure if that directly applies to the Army contract. Although the funding did aid in the lab development, so, yeah, let's add that, too.

5) "Seems like" sounds like another opinion. All I did is report what the company said. They've been stating the MOU since 2019. Then in 2021 they broke "radio silence" to mention Polartec again in their "First-ever Spider Silk shipment" PR dated February 23, 2021.

6) Must have got tired.

7) See #6

8) "Was that ever discussed here?" Now I understand why all the questions. One has to read what the company says. Not what is discussed here to get the REAL info.

9) Lost in the shuffle, I guess.

Thanks for reading, too. But I really would suggest reading what the company says. They really do know more than all of us combined about what's really going on with their company.

[want2retire]

The ambiguous part. I think that's one of the cruxes of the whole issue. Yes, they said they were doubling. But it's been pointed out that Prodigy went from 7 down to 5, and now they're doubling? That seems disingenuous to state it like that. Are there new inputs? Yes, I guess. That's what the PR said. What are they? How much are they? What ramifications does that have? No one really knows. So I don't see a need to get happy about something they won't tell in a direct and clear manner. Otherwise, why the ambiguity from a former lawyer? Accelerated production is in the same boat. Without specifics it's virtually meaningless. That's my take.

First, is it odd to receive statements with some ambiguity from a lawyer? In my experience, it would be odd if the language were clear and concise!

They have secured additional inputs. They told us it is to

expand near-term production of its eco-friendly spider silk

.

Is this a positive step for a company looking to increase production to fulfill current and future contracts? I would say yes. Is it a reason to be giddy and bet the farm? Not for me but, between options of positive, negative or meh, I take this series of events/announcements as a step forward for the company. Something we should all at least be cautiously pleased to see.

Accelerated production, by its very name, has to be better than reduced production or the same production or no production. So, within the spectrum of options available, with the information known, I can only see accelerating production, from whatever to whatever plus "X", as another positive step for the company.

Does all of this mean we've arrived? That are worries are over? Blue skies ahead? No, not for me, and I've stated as much, several times.

The labels are where I struggle. I don't think I need to strain credulity to view information received from October 2020 forward as representative of a company moving forward and progressing.

Wide eyed optimist? nope. Beat down, scarred by my past pessimist? Nope. Seeing signs that point to reasons to remain cautiously optimistic that production is expanding, growth is happening and future updates could likely be much more impactful? Yep, I guess that's where I'm at.

GLTA
W2R