Thanks for the info about testing SVC, the issue seems to be more about the company's ability to sell than the software quality. Although, I've yet to see any results of any independent testing. I wonder if they even gave it to anyone to test and publish the results. It would be good free publicity, and if they didn't, you gotta wonder why.
About your second post though. It's not name calling to call Kay a liar, it's an accurate description. No one enjoys calling out the CEO of a company in which they hold shares, but the examples are numerous and provable. I wonder why you think it should be overlooked.
There's a world of difference between that and calling anyone you disagree with an idiot, or whatever.
Many of the years old references are from June, by the way. Ask anyone who's been a shareholder for a year of more about this stuff.