InvestorsHub Logo

FrankF

03/17/21 1:51 PM

#40831 RE: waterchaser #40828

LOL,conveniently left off the rest of the sentence:

"Currently, this asset is illiquid however it
is managements understanding the developers are making great strides
to become an extremely liquid currency just like bitcoin and
Litecoin the industry leaders of crypto currency. "

That was a full 9 months ago.

Meantime, the illiquidity was our friend, since it in a sense locked us into the play until now . . .

which is why we STILL HAVE them all.

Another poster claiming some were already sold.

Which is it? Did we sell some of them? Or are they illiquid? If we sold some then they're not still illiquid; and if they're illiquid we still have them all.

Slojab

03/17/21 1:52 PM

#40834 RE: waterchaser #40828

Yeah, I read that too, under HISTORY OF COMPANY

Which funny enough starts out with this hilarious sentence.

U.S. Energy Initiatives Corporation is a diverse (OTC Pink: USEI) energy firm started in 1996 and the firm has a long successful business history of developing its business strategies

So successful that they reported zero sales for the quarter. And not just for the most recent quarter but for years.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/USEI/financials

On another note, I would dearly love to see what a forensic accounting of this quarter's reported numbers for assets would show. Aside from giving Sumcoin a value beyond what it was worth at the time of being acquired. Setting a date when the coin was priced at $300 to report it's "value" is rather arbitrary. Especially, when it's recognized as illiquid.

BADALI

05/12/21 5:43 PM

#41965 RE: waterchaser #40828

India is too hot
Love TATA what they are doing over the world
Green Enery
And solar power