InvestorsHub Logo

zagdad

08/16/01 11:03 AM

#10833 RE: Francois+Goelo #10831

FG,

Understand your point but I hope the new team running the company have the gonades to do what's right and not just play the role of a puppet in these areas of concern which the 10Q has brought to the forefront. I believe we need their response and consideration (and immediate reconsideration of this dilution approach at shareholders expense) to keep this ship a float and on target. I have no problem with key employees and the captains of the ship having lots of incentive to be successful if they are capable but 17M shares is beyond belief and reason. The low authorization, issue, and float of shares has always been one of the reasons that many long's have hung in there during the rough yo-yo of prices, product, and PR - I don't want to see that disappear - bet too much on it todate!!

zagdad

dk76

08/16/01 11:05 AM

#10834 RE: Francois+Goelo #10831

I agree with Zagdad and others about your attacks on McBride. You may be understandably upset, and even betrayed, but I think the bigger problem I have with the situation is your apparant attempt to keep McBride from posting. You let Printmail post 3rd hand BS for months, yet when the entire IHub community is asking questions and making accusations about Rich, you seem to want to block him from responding.

We can choose to believe or not believe what he says, and I've stated before that I wish he wouldn't post here, but if there was ever a time when he deserves to be heard, I'd say it's now.

Even the guilty have a right to speak, and McBride has not been proven guilty.

He has put up with endless BS from posters on this board and RB. Regardless of whether he's right or wrong, it seems he deserves to speak his mind if he chooses.



TAfirehawk

08/16/01 4:33 PM

#10913 RE: Francois+Goelo #10831

FG, What confirmation do you have, please post and don't use the 10Q either.

JMHO, TAfirehawk