InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rafunrafun

03/08/21 1:11 PM

#328753 RE: ralphey #328746

R - I'm not arguing against Vastor, I think it's needed, even if 100% of gV disappears tomorrow, but...

If (huge, game changing IF) other insurers follow UHC and end coverage for gV, then gV disappears and there is no infringement.
icon url

jfmcrr

03/10/21 6:47 PM

#329236 RE: ralphey #328746

The pharmacy will then be liable for infringement - and therein lies the war of attrition AMRN will need to fight - the problem is no one knows for what indication an MD writes the RX for - thereby allowing infringement to slip in and requiring a lengthy, messy, time consuming and expensive process to eliminate such BUT WAIT ...ALL IS NOT LOST ...ENTER

VASTOR - the new enhanced statin (VAscepa plus a statin) - its clear that it must be for CAD and will be impossible to substitute gV for such without revealing direct infringement -

1.) VASTOR is much easier to market Docs know what a statin is and will be immediately attracted to an ENHANCED STATIN OVER A MODIFIED FISH OIL
2.) Infringement is immediately proven preventing such
3.) AMRN captures vast majority of statin market
4.) Stock price soars




Better idea; Fund an ambulance chaser in each state/major city to chase down prescription/patent cases.

<Call this 1-800 number>
<Is your health being compromised for a big wigs yearly bonus?>
<Are you owed a settlement?>
<Is your insurance company stealing your benefits?>
<Would you like to work with someone else's prepaid big time lawyer?>
<Call this number right now!!!>