InvestorsHub Logo

66

02/26/21 8:12 AM

#15617 RE: jalive #15616

We JAMN'in !! $$$$$$

WarMachine

02/26/21 9:00 AM

#15618 RE: jalive #15616

READING IS A KEY PART OF UNDERSTANDING FOLKS. lol Smoke and mirrors CAN'T CHANGE FACTS.

It doesn't have to be a SEC document, that is absolute hogwash.
If the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT isn't legal enough for anybody than you just don't care about how the legal system actually works.

CLEAR AS A SUNNY DAY, ON THE DOCUMENT LINKED
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/memoranda/2019/01/09/17-56245.pdf

HOPE ROAD MERCHANDISING LLC,
a Florida limited liability company;
FIFTY-SIX HOPE ROAD MUSIC LIMITED,
a Bahamian corporation,
Plaintiffs-counter-defendants-Appellees,

v.

JAMMIN JAVA CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation,
Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant


In reality, what the key thing is .....
No matter the money owed .....
The REASON that JAMN had this case go against them is that the AGREEMENT WITH MARLEY EXPIRED and JAMN continued to used the name/brand ILLEGALLY. The court awarded damages and back royalties due. Deny all you wish, still doesn't change the FACTS.
The FACT that the AGREEMENT EXPIRED proves JAMN NO LONGER HAS MARLEY COFFEE. And the FACT that there has been no documentation to show that another agreement was made AFTER THE LAWSUIT proves that there is no new or extended agreement.
Any current sales, any big name promoters of the brand, anything Marley has NOTHING TO DO WITH $JAMN.