InvestorsHub Logo

HDGabor

02/24/21 11:50 AM

#326575 RE: hayward #326565

h-

intent to infringe

I do not know who "introduced" this determination to the board but it does not exist. It could be:
- intent of inducement
- inducement of infringement

(From memory) Astra Zeneca vs xxx: The court said they are not exist to determine what the defendant will do or do not do in the future ... refused the intent of inducement claim.

Please note: "intent claim" is a claim in a prelaunch cases ... after generic launch they are liable for inducement of infringement (or not).

Best,
G