I do not know who "introduced" this determination to the board but it does not exist. It could be: - intent of inducement - inducement of infringement
(From memory) Astra Zeneca vs xxx: The court said they are not exist to determine what the defendant will do or do not do in the future ... refused the intent of inducement claim.
Please note: "intent claim" is a claim in a prelaunch cases ... after generic launch they are liable for inducement of infringement (or not).