InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

studythosestocks

02/24/21 9:42 AM

#326536 RE: johngnatt #326535

Nice find. Amicus in our favor
icon url

Bouf

02/24/21 10:15 AM

#326542 RE: johngnatt #326535

Wow, that is an exceptional brief supporting AMRN’s position in the SCOTUS.
icon url

marjac

02/24/21 10:20 AM

#326544 RE: johngnatt #326535

Great find. Great Brief. Thank you.
icon url

hayward

02/24/21 11:20 AM

#326558 RE: johngnatt #326535

johngnatt

They better watch out these guys are from Chicago !!! HA HA

Michael
icon url

Meowza

02/24/21 11:48 AM

#326574 RE: johngnatt #326535

Very satisfying to read that brief. It captures the entire point of our IP regime, and identifies why patents are separate and distinct from trademarks (in my lay opinion).
icon url

MateoPaisa

02/24/21 4:36 PM

#326624 RE: johngnatt #326535

I am SO impressed with this Amicus brief. Obviousness and its role in patent law could not have possibly been better written about. Everyone can understand this.

The District (and circuit) courts directly abrogate the law on obviousness. SCOTUS really should (but likely will not) hear this case!
icon url

Pterion

02/24/21 7:45 PM

#326655 RE: johngnatt #326535

Amazing. Looking to add more shares here.