InvestorsHub Logo

luvbio

02/18/21 1:33 AM

#325586 RE: lettruthringout #325585

Wow, how cool is that?? Let's rocknroll.

yudilks

02/18/21 1:33 AM

#325587 RE: lettruthringout #325585

Looking at the file name, the document was submitted last week (2021 Feb 11th)? Or is it a new one?

postes

02/18/21 1:50 AM

#325588 RE: lettruthringout #325585

Thank you for posting..first quick read through looks very clean and extremely easy to understand.

alm2

02/18/21 3:20 AM

#325590 RE: lettruthringout #325585

Petition to the Supreme Court

Extremely well written - makes very clear what the Federal Court has allowed to develop runs completely contrary to Supreme Court Precedent (added to which the DC added the new precedent of “weighing “elements against each other which FC has allowed to stand) and that if this deviation from the correct application of the Graham criteria continues patent law is left in a complete and utter shambles -and moreover allows FC to determine precedent

Hard to see how Hikma and DR can suggest that this request is based on a false premise

If there be any justice this will succeed
Alm

ralphey

02/18/21 9:44 AM

#325616 RE: lettruthringout #325585

At the beginning of
Amarin’s clinical trial, Amarin hosted a group of experts to solicit their input on the trial design and the
potential effects of EPA. C.A.J.A. 43971, 43974-43977.
Amarin provided those experts with extensive materials on EPA, including a summary of the prior art studies.
The experts expressed the view that, upon administering pure EPA, bad cholesterol “is likely to go up as it
does with virtually all [triglyceride] lowering therapies
in” patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia.
C.A.J.A. 47719-47722.
Those experts turned out to be wrong.



Yet Judge Du says t was obvious !!!

A panel of experts prior to the the trial says it wont work and DU says it was obvious it would work !!!!