InvestorsHub Logo

10 bagger

01/12/07 9:36 AM

#8614 RE: Dr Bill #8613

GFCI..

Dr. Bill.. I think that you are not thinking correctly.. If there were not some one as well spoken and someone that has such a flair for the English language this scam would of never gone this far.. I think at present it really doesn't matter any longer what BBB says other than to keep what is left of his group from selling..

A whole new level and style of Investor is coming aboard thru massive stock placements by Boiler Room operators.. BBB has become the fly on the wall and not anything else as GFCI has found other more powerful distribution systems... Those that push GFCI could care less if GFCI is for real or make money as long as the money comes in to line thier own pockets... GFCI is in the last stages of promotion as even many days back to back of plus 1,500,000 share days has not moved this stock one way or another...

Those who buy now are told it is a gamble and they purchase out of greed and fun,,, not because they have read any of the past 78 PR Releases.. The shares held by BBB and friends are but symbolic of the information that has been relayed thru BBB and will go down with the ship and after the reverse spit be but a very small part of the new share structure...

Dr. Bill,,, the last of investors of old still holding on for a profit have lost any ability to recoop any funds they have invested as the share count grows daily while thier holdings are diluted and any symbolic vote taken will have as much voice on this saga as the seemingly share counts of the past.... They I doubt they still believe that GFCI has naked shorts to blame this all on... Who are and always were the third party's that have continued to promote this fool's gold....??? hank

Trinityz1

01/12/07 10:03 AM

#8615 RE: Dr Bill #8613

Mr. Bill,
I was thinking the exact same thing.
But I doubt BBB would go along with this.

best2listen

01/12/07 12:54 PM

#8617 RE: Dr Bill #8613

Dr. Bill re: shareholder rebellion

You'll find Grifco in court complaining that the proxies were illegally solicited and demanding an injunction (all legal fees paid for by Grifco shareholders of course). This happened when some Senetek PLC shareholders, led by mad fund manager Heiko Thieme, rebelled and wanted their candidate on the board. Here's their "Dear Shareholder" letter explaining their actions after the stock had lost 80% of it's value under management's stewardship

http://www.senetekplc.net/SENETEK/Shareholder%20letter%20Nov%202003.pdf

"..the Company was forced to file a lawsuit to seek the protection of the Federal District Court. Senetek contends in its lawsuit that the Thieme brothers’ efforts were a flagrant violation of the proxy rules..."

Maybe there has been good reason for a shareholder rebellion in some situations. But consider the posibility that you're right about Grifco's assets and float. Some might fell vindicated by a lawsuit or shareholder rebellion but how would shareholders benefit financially?

best2