I'm not going to belabor the discussion on quarterly statements and financials since there was already really good discussion.
But the thing you keep saying is that the company had set the target price of .61 which isn't correct. That was an analyst set price which if you dig through their details they report as being on the conservative side. Both their original report and update occurred before a lot of the things that have happened recently so that price could easily be updated.
I definitely appreciate the questions into any possible drawbacks in this company or any I invested in because it helps all of us think more critically about anything happening, but please focus on only bringing facts to the table.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
