AMRN's explanation for why they did not pursue this point, is for AMRN to provide. We will not speculate. Nor do we intend to critique AMRN or its lawyers. Rather, we will cite cases for the proposition that none of this matters, as the Court is required as a matter of law to address these allegations on the merits.
Bouf / marjac No the fraud had two clear parts The giving of evidence - which was not truthful The deliberate use of the cropped table to support that false evidence
The cropped table made the lie appear to be factually correct
It was not an accident that cropped table was introduced - they knew it would impact in exactly the way it did
It was a premeditated plan
Let’s call H - he will tell the court it was black even though he knows (as we the defendants do ) it was white - Then introduce the cropped table which shows it was definitely black - When actually the full table made it crystal clear it was white Alm
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
