InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

eightisenough

02/04/21 7:36 AM

#323460 RE: Jasbg #323454

jas-I intentionally refrained from giving my feelings on the motion--as I respect marj and all those involved efforts to right the wrong. If marj and co. wouldn't have made the motion--I told JT I was preparing to do it my self for the principal.

Yet, when trip asked me my opinion--and you guys already raised most of the funds , I felt compelled to answer tip--since we have a relationship, I try to speak honestly.

As far as the germans and wwii--it is an awful comparison. Jews and gentiles were slaughtered by that regime and of course to try to save every human being. Here, as a litigator, my experience is once a judge (and app. judges) don't give you time of day--it is useless to continue litigating IN FRONT OF THEM. Your only chance is a new suit (ie infringement) and new judge/ or jury.

I hope we win but will be shocked if Du is big enough to admit mistake....It takes more than a few ihub members to change corrupt judges/system (reform+should never have 1 judge to decide cases)

8
icon url

dukesking

02/04/21 8:53 AM

#323490 RE: Jasbg #323454

Jasbg, I agree. Change usually comes from individuals banning together in a collective movement like this one. Waiting on politicians and our judicial system to solve the problem is a pipe dream. We saw the power of this type of collective action via Reddit recently. I’d rather try and fail than do nothing. Not trying is worse than failing. IMO. Go team AMRN for justice!