Replies to post #13691 on NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[Longpicker]

You have a link to that whistle blower page at the SEC?
I wanted to look something up, not related to NNLX

[Omar8]

MV,





I think besides that whistleblower stuff it appears the company was waiting on the patent. If the company wasn't going justify devoting resources until then maybe other "potential" partner wasn't either ? Maybe that is why after patent they sent out that PR ? So how much of a factor was the "whistleblower" ? Sounds like to me the patent was hold up.


Also, the company put this out below, they were working on a testing platform almost 4 months now, was it successful ? They got their big brain working in Deveopment is he getting anywhere ?



Oct. 14, 2020

NanoLogix Is Researching FDA EUA Requirements For COVID-19 Testing Related to Recently Allowed Patent

1st For Whole Virus Detection, 2nd For Antibody Detection

NanoLogix Welcomes David R. Barnhizer as Vice President For Strategic Analysis and Development

NanoLogix is researching FDA requirements for EUA's for two of the 25 covered claims in the recently allowed patent application focused upon Rapid Virus Detection. Now that there has been allowance for issue of the patent with all 25 claims allowed, NanoLogix can justify devoting resources to this process and specifics.

Upon successful results for work currently being performed by a third party to apply NanoLogix technology to a separate testing platform for COVID19 detection, other applications may follow. Once the patent is issued we will reveal the broad and detailed extent of allowed claims for this technology.

[Emerald Isle]

Medveteran,

Your first paragraph argument is fallacious inasmuch as whether you are or are not responsible for the false accusations, you misrepresent the process. Your SEC would not reveal the identity of an accuser under any circumstances other than if they had devoted resources to determining who made false accusations. That is the anonymity part of their accusations/reporting process. Using the term whistleblower is also disingenuous, as by definition it implies someone internal to the operation of a company, which obviously you are not. Since Nanologix is an inconsequential company as a non reporting pink sheet it’s doubtful the SEC has any interest in doing what would be the right thing and pursuing the false accuser. The SEC also would never reveal an investigation if there was no action taken. It would be a non event for which YOU would not find a record, so that constitutes your misrepresentation.

EI

[Ant4]

Medical Veteran
I'm impressed you knew exactly what you are talking about.

Your post was Feb 2021 last I checked that was 2 YEARS AGO. So much progress since then! lol

If you look at Bret's background it is void of any experience in medical technology or capital raising. It appears his career was with Fortune 500 companies.

For those who say that Bret was financing Nano with his own funds how do you know that? When was the last time he provided a financial statement?

Ask Bret to post a copy of the agreement between him/Faro and Nano that gives Nano any interest in the patents. There is none.

Ask Bret if it is true that Nano no long exists since 2018 as a corporation.

Ask Bret how he sold PIPE securities of a company that hasn't existed since 2018. Obviously it is a state and federal criminal offense to sell securities in a corporation that does not exist.

Ask Bret if it is true that Nano owes Delaware $400,000

And for those of you that think I'm a basher don't ask him any of the above simply ask him when he is going to hold a SH meeting and explain to you what his plan is. He says he can't deal with us because of allegations against me that were settled for $155? He has committed serious violations of securities and financial laws that IMO will put him in jail.

To anyone that invested in PIPEs after 2018, unless Bret/Faro's disclosed to you that the corporation was voided by Delaware at the time you invested, you should organize and bring an action against Bret and both Faro's for fraud. Although Nano has no funds to pay a judgement I believe the court would award you the patents or an interest in them. There are many securities fraud attorneys that would handle it on a contingency.