Bouf, thank you for this. I didn't know that. Again, however, I don't know that the timing of this case was right because of the limited amount of provable losses at this stage. One way to slay the beast is to destroy it economically, which has a ripple effect throughout (the industry) and would be, theoretically, a pretty way to disincentivize other would-be infringers.
Of course, the firm representing AMRN should know what they're doing
I thought courts didn't grant injunctions unless they believed you were likely to win - Hikma hasn't filed it's response yet, so the court can't make a judgement. Think you also have to show imminent and irreversible harm would occur without the injunction?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
