InvestorsHub Logo

JRIII

01/28/21 4:51 PM

#350984 RE: Maverick0408 #350437

Can we agree that the science is good? Otherwise why would Linda Liau et al at UCLA and other collaborators continue to say positive things about DCVAX and also bet the future with combo trials to improve efficacy even further?



No, we cannot agree that the science is good until we see trial results that prove it. I want to believe the science is good, but I am not optimistic that NWBO will be able to prove it with the hack job they have done on this 14-year trial. A lot of people who post here cannot understand that distinction. I think it's going to be clear pretty soon that we should have started over six years ago.